Loading...
Book NameAuthor Names2024
Genres: List of Genres
PlaceholderPlaceholderPlaceholderPlaceholder
PlaceholderPlaceholderPlaceholder
Write a comment/review
Your rating
Post
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
1.2.3.4.5.6
Exclusive savings
instagram
facebook
twitter
linkdin
linkdin
tiktok
threads

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Partners
  • FAQ

EXPLORE

  • Book Clubs
  • How It Works
  • Genres

LEGAL

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data and Privacy Preferences

CONNECT

  • Newsletter Signup
  • Affiliate Programme
  • Blog / Editorial
Powered by World Privilege Plus
Hayek: A Collaborative Biography: Part XV: The Chicago School of Economics, Hayek’s ‘luck’ and the 1974 Nobel Prize for Economic Science

Hayek: A Collaborative Biography: Part XV: The Chicago School of Economics, Hayek’s ‘luck’ and the 1974 Nobel Prize for Economic Science

Robert Leeson

2020

Genres: Business

On 9 August 1974, Richard Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment; on 29 April 1975, the United States scuttled from their Embassy in Saigon - optics that were interpreted as defeats for the ‘International Right’. Yet in 1975, Margaret Thatcher became leader of the Conservative Party; and in 1976 Ronald Reagan almost unseated a sitting Republican Party President.  Pivotal to the ‘turn to the Right’ was Friedrich ‘von’ Hayek’s 1974 Nobel Prize for Economic Science - awarded for having used Austrian Business Cycle Theory to predict the Great Depression: ‘For him it is not a matter of a simple defence of a liberal system of society as may sometimes appear from the popularized versions of his thinking.’ The evidence suggests that Hayek’s fraudulent assertion was uncovered at the University of Chicago in the early 1930s – but not reported. The most likely explanation is self-censorship - for reasons of ideological correctness, fund raising and residual deference to the Second Estate. Four indirect tests suggest that ‘free’ market economists have - in other instances and presumably for fund-raising motives - suppressed embarrassing ‘knowledge’: which suggests that they were perfectly capable of suppressing ‘knowledge’ about Hayek’s non-prediction of the Great Depression. With respect to the Nobel Prize and thus his ability to reach a wider audience, Hayek was fortune in having two loyal ‘intermediaries’: Lionel Robbins and Fritz Machlup who were – and probably felt themselves to be – ‘socially’ inferior to ‘von’ Hayek.
Want to ReadMark as ReadReviewsEdit

Write a comment/review

Sign UpLogin
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
User name
0 reviews
165 followers
PlaceholderPlaceholder
July 31, 2026
1.2.3.4.5.6
Exclusive savings
Reader's Voices
Reader's Voices
Join a club
Join a club
Children
Children
Non-Fiction
Non-Fiction
Fiction
Fiction
eBooks
eBooks
Bookfellers rewards
Bookfellers rewards
BookfellersBeta
  • Clubs
Sign Up
Sign in
Add a book club
|Join a club
|
|
|
|eBooks
|Bookfellers rewards